If you found a way to make money, almost riskfree, would you share it with other people at forums or other pages at the internet if this could mean that the oportunity to do this got lost..?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Egoistic or selfish?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by aka_thn View PostIf you found a way to make money, almost riskfree, would you share it with other people at forums or other pages at the internet if this could mean that the oportunity to do this got lost..?
But even if you did give exact instructions, a lot of people still wouldn't make money from it as they wouldn't follow the instructions...If you want more luck... Take more chances!
-
Sounds like you are opening an Ayn Rand discussion here? (Ayn Rand: The Virtue of Selfishness)
What would be the objective of sharing a strategy, if by doing that you had dilluted it into history? Brief personal fame? Apparent altruism?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cran View PostI would give generic advice, but not the details of successful edges.
But even if you did give exact instructions, a lot of people still wouldn't make money from it as they wouldn't follow the instructions...The odds of succes dramaticly improve with each attempt
Comment
-
people who post oddles of videos showing off random winning trades are usually egotistic (no need to mention names).
Perosnally if i had a guarenteed edge (such a thing probbaly doesnt exist and if it does it will be short lived) I would keep it to myself.
Comment
-
Do a google for Turtle Traders. 100 people were taught to trade (stocks) in the 1970s or thereabouts. 2 made it. The system got out, anyway, and other traders, knowing what many were looking for, counter-traded and thus the original system no longer works.
I'm only telling you this because I am awesome and you should know this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shadowninja View PostDo a google for Turtle Traders. 100 people were taught to trade (stocks) in the 1970s or thereabouts. 2 made it. The system got out, anyway, and other traders, knowing what many were looking for, counter-traded and thus the original system no longer works.
I'm only telling you this because I am awesome and you should know this.
Comment
-
Frankly I don't believe that 'risk free' strategies exist. The only real strategies that make consistent money are 'calculated' approaches that have both a consistent set of rules for both entry and more importantly exit from the Market position. I hope the regulars on here would agree that 'risk free' generally means 'profit free' as well. For my part the question of whether or not I would share a strategy with others would depend predominantly on whether or not I believed that person would follow my instructions and thereby keep the strategy pure. In my experience when I have shared a few 'tips' with friends and family they invariably follow it for a short time and then decide that they can do better. What follows is the time honoured descent from trading into gambling with what we all know is the inevitable result - bang goes the bank. The main force that opposes most people's desire to explain or illucidate on their strategies is the belief that somehow this will affect the Market to the detriment of the strategy. It's my belief that generally it is only the gamblers that push the Market prices to and fro. The traders slip in fairly unnoticed and out again with their profit.
Comment
-
Sports trading is like making love to a beautiful woman...
Originally posted by Constantine View PostThe traders slip in fairly unnoticed and out again with their profit.
http://powdermonster.net/amusing/txt...ng.php?show=48
Comment
-
there is no strategy that is risk free.if someone likes risk free strategies then he should work as a teacher,doctor etc.they're almost risk free as far as the system doesn't decide to reduce personnel,you'll get your wages,same wages every month,same day of the month etc.now,if such a thing did exist and i knew it of course i wouldn't share it as it's obvious it would stop working so in the end nobody would make money out of it.
Comment
Comment